asp.net - IIS7 HttpModule and ISAPI Filter execution order -

asp.net - IIS7 HttpModule and ISAPI Filter execution order -

I have a custom HTML module along with a site that redirects both URLs and rewrite them.

In IIS 6, everything works fine: ISAPI will run the rewrite filter first, followed by the HTPP module. The sequence in IIS 7 (Integrated Mode) is now reverse, which is a problem.

My problem, in particular, is that there is a condition in the HTTP module where it is context .RewritePath . If no document has been provided, it will explicitly add "index.aspx", so a request for / test / is passed to /test/index.aspx Is written again.

At some point after executing the path, the ISAPI executes the rewrite filter. We have a rule that does the opposite of the module: Request for /test/index.aspx is requested to redirect 301- to / test / . Thus, we have an endless loop.

How is the execution order for fixed HTTP modules and ISAPI filters in IIS 7? What order can be changed? I found it, but it did not really help. I am not the master of IIS 7, but to a lesser extent I understand that modules and ISAPI filters run "together". Unfortunately, they are still administered in a different way and I can not understand how to run one before the other. help!

Note: Assume I can not change the existing code. It works in IIS 6. I just want to know that there is no way to work in IIS 7 unified mode.

  I have such a problem where I thought that ISAPI is done before writing again, But apparently it is not how things work with IIS7  
 I have found this thread that  
  In the unified mode the basic modules, ISPI and NAT events Is called mixed together  
 For example if this is an initial request then the original module comes first, then the IP , Then the net code. After that everything will repeat AuthenticateRequest ...  
 It was done some time ago: ISPI has taken action on all the incidents, and then only the .net was implemented. Probably this is what you have assumed   
  
 Hope it helps








03:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger