ubuntu - Errors when building the cross compiler on debian -

ubuntu - Errors when building the cross compiler on debian -

I want to compile the kernel for powerpc I try to do it on an x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04, and an i386 Debian , And I have the same problem. I follow the following instructions, and when I try to make binutils by giving the following command:

  fakeroot debian / binary-cross    get me This result:  
  [snip] [3]: Entering directory `/home/anthony/cross-toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/builddir-powerpc-linux-gnu/libiberty ' If [X "-fpic"! = X]; Then \ gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -Wno-format-security -I-i./../ Liberty /../Included -W -Wall -Wwrite-string-WC ++ - Compete -Friendly- Prototype -Pindi-Fopic ../../libiberty/regex.c -o pic / regex o; \ real truth; Fi file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:320, ../../libiberty/regex.c:128: /usr/include/sys/types.h:100: Error: Two or more data announcements Types in the specifiers [3]: *** [regex.o] Error 1 [snip]    (This is because type-typing typing pid_t, which, however, defined # # If I detect this problem in types.h inside #undef pid_t, then I get a similar problem somewhere else with intptr_t and so on and so on.)   < P> 
  if you do Nail the need to cross-compile, then you should be able to do the following:  
  CROSS_COMPILE = & Lt; Gcc & gt; Before part of the command ARCH = powerpc make menuconfig ARCH = powerpc all # ... Others for modules, docs, etc.    Make sure that you have a cross-compiler in your path if you have cross-compiler command  ppc_74xx-gcc  for your GCC, then you  CROSS_COMPILE = Ppc_74xx -    
, for more information on setting up the CROSS_COMPILE variable, take a look at this link  
 If you have a scratch If you are looking to build your cross-toolchain, check this site shows you how to cross-compile Linux Your own toolknow, kernel, user location, etc.   

 


  







03:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger