c++ - Why wont my while statement work? -

c++ - Why wont my while statement work? -

I think I'm doing everything fine ... but obviously I'm missing something, my The statement does not seem to please help please enter ....

  #include & lt; Iostream & gt; using namespace std; Zero swap (int * aPtr, int * bPtr) {int holder = 0; Holder = * aPtr; * APTR = * bPtr; * BPtr = Holder; } Zero Starter (int * DPTR, int * XPTR, int * ypt, int a) {* dptr = a; * XPtr = 1; * YPtr = 0; } Zero cruncher (int * xPtr, int * dptr, int * aPtr, int * yPtr, int * bPtr) {int x 1 = 0, x2 = 1, y1 = 1, y2 = 0, r = 0, q = 0 ; Whereas (* bPtr & gt; 0) {q = * aPtr / (* bPtr); R = * aPtr% * bPtr; * XPtr = x2- (Q * x1); * YPtr = y2- (Q * y1); * APTR = * bPtr; * BPtr = r; X2 = x 1; X1 = * xPtr; Y2 = y1; Y1 = * xPtr; The court's & lt; & Lt; X & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; RK & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; * XPtr & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; * YPtr & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; * APtr & lt; & Lt; "" & lt; & Lt; * BPtr & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; X1 & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; X2 & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; Y2 & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; Y1 & lt; & Lt; Endl; } Cout & lt; & Lt; Endl; * DPTR = * aPtr; * XPtr = x2; * YPtr = y2; } Int main () {int a = 4864, b = 3458, d, * aPtr, * bPtr, * dPtr, x, * xPtr, y, * yPtr; APtr = & amp; One; BPtr = And B; DPTR = & amp; D; XPtr = & amp; X; YPtr = & amp; Y; If (B = 0) instantator (DPTR, XPTR, YPTR, A); If (A and Lt; B) swap (APTR, BPTR); Cruncher (xPtr, DPTR, aPtr, yPtr, bPtr); The court's & lt; & Lt; D & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; X's & lt; & Lt; "" & Lt; & Lt; Y; Return 0; }     after    loop  > * BPTR & gt; 0 , then using  b  for  0  in  main  (using  if (b = 0) for you ) and then pass an indicator as  bPtr . Try deciding  if  statement in  main  and see if this behavior changes.   

 


  







02:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger