sql server - SQL Partitions, query analyzer and performance -


I'm closing a table For example, if I have a partition for records between 2005 - 200 And the record is second for 2010 - is ON and I select for all Records = 2010, due to the split function, SQL will ignore the first partition. If I search for records between SQLS 2008-2010 then both partitions will be used but do so in a parallel manner. It is true to assume that if I query for all records with no predicate, that SQL will use all the partitions in a parallel manner (to do the best of its capabilities)?

Is Table Split Performance Bottle Neck Reasonable?

All your points are correct, parallelism is not directly related to the partition, although it does not alter the job There is more chance of breaking.

For the last question, there is no real issue which I know is that due to division the bottle of performance is neck. If the similarity is giving you performance problems then the problem is that there is parallelism , not with division - repeat me that they are not directly related wrongly With parallel questions, common issues occur with or without equation, and common methods are applied to solve it.

Related reading:

  • < Li>

Comments