java - JSP Custom tag with JSF body -

java - JSP Custom tag with JSF body -

I'm typing to create my own template system for a site, I use "Template Insert" and "TemplateForest" Two custom tags have been created by name, which will use them in this way:

  & lt; Prefix: insert templateFile = "someFile> gt; prefix: for name =" body "& gt; some content here & lt; / prefix: for & gt; other prefix: for tag ... & lt ; / Prefix: insert & gt;    This works perfectly, unless you have a JSF tag inside the "content" server does not parse them. How can I fix this?  
 Cheers!   
 
  JSF JSF Reasons to succeed in JSAP versus 2.0 / Java EE 6 JSP offers very little templateability capabilities, you can use FaceText 1.x on JSF 1.x if you install it separately.  
 From the Facet Box Examples:  
  template.xhtml   
  & lt ;! DOCTYPE html & gt; & lt; Html lang = "en" xmlns = "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns: f = "http: // java.sun.com/jsf/c ore" xmlns: h = "http: //java.sun.com/jsf/html "xmlns: ui =" http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets "& gt; & Lt; Top & gt; & Lt; Title & gt; & Lt; Ui: insert name = "title" /> & Lt; / Heading & gt; & Lt; / Head & gt; & Lt; Body & gt; & Lt; UI: Insert name = "body" /> & Lt; / Body & gt; & Lt; / Html & gt;     page.xhtml   
  & lt; Ui: Composition template = "template.xhtml" xmlns: f = "http: //java.sun.com/jsf/core" xmlns: h = "http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" xmlns: Ui = "http://java.sun.com/jsf/ False" & gt; & Lt; Ui: defined name = "title" & gt; Page Title & lt; / UI: Define & gt; & Lt; Ui: define name = "body" & gt; & Lt; H: Output Text Value = "JSF Tags Just Work Here." / & Gt; & Lt; / Ui: defined & gt; & Lt; / Ui: Composition & gt;    I would say, instead of changing one on the basis of JSP, go for facelets as JSF visualization technique.   

 


  







03:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger