wpf - Finding the true memory footprint of a Windows application -

wpf - Finding the true memory footprint of a Windows application -

I have participated in some outsourced exceptions with my C # / WPF application and I am trying to get some confusing data running my memory usage profile

when the app is usually running, then made bounced a bit in Windows Task Manager memory usage to approximately 34 MB (objects and garbage collected) Shows When I run the Memory Profiling application and as such, they show total memory usage in about 1.2 MB.

Why this huge discrepancy? What does the task manager see that these profiles do not?

Update: I added some diet code in my application to print many memory information every time through process data.

During my app running, I set a rule to dump the memory in case of an exception. I forced an exception to be made and the memory dumped. At this point, the memory usage of my app (shown by the task manager) jumped from 32 MB to 145 MB and remained there.

You can see this jump in the table below (Workingset 64). I am still trying to understand all types of memory information provided by the process class. How does an external application work my app grow like this?

Some of the diagnostic tools used here have been used, plus (which is a lot of money) let me leak Found the source.

The WPF bitmap may cause leak of the FAFST class. Alternative "Impact" section fixes the leak,
Aksamel the merged resource Dikshniks can cause leakage,
"working set of an application" memory footprint (Task Manager Memory shown by) is not a good indicator of the footprint of your process. External applications can have an impact on this.
Memory profiling tool helped me to know that the leaks were mostly in unmanaged code, so that it was a real pain to track it. As well as dealing with these leaks, things have been cleared up in better understanding of Windows Memory (Personal vs. Work Set).

03:22

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use a disconnected port object -

While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason? Full stack trace: Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038 This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener? I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...

visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -

I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device. Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen. You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!

Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -

I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this? Something like this will appear in the proxy code. #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things? Any ideas? you can git rev-parse -verify HEAD (after :) This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. " git diff " There is very little possibility to change I find it more pronounced rev-parse -verify means "is this a valid object name?" This is your show-ref . You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?" I ask, "what current head exists?" In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...

Powered by Blogger