How is the Visual Studio 2010 SP1 HTML5 support different than the Gallery download? -

How is the Visual Studio 2010 SP1 HTML5 support different than the Gallery download? -

Before the release of Visual Studio 2010 SP1, there was. I downloaded it earlier and used that HTML5 Intelligence (with some custom modifications, I support some data-attributes in my project). After upgrading to SP1, I checked the .xsd file ~~, which had the same date. I do not think HTML5 support has changed.~~

  C: \ program files (x86) \ Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0 \ Common7 \ package \ schema \ html \ html_5.xsd    There are some good links, but I can not find anything definite.  
  Edit : I have made a false impression on file dates. Since, I installed Visual Studio on 1/19/2011 and SP1 files are dated 1/18/2011, I think they have not made changes.   
 
  I received a copy of the original HTML_5.xsd (date 4/1/2010), I think That was supported for VS2008 in one place:  
  C: \ Program Files (x86) \ Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0 \ Common7 \ Packages \ Schemas \ HTML \    I was able to compare files and WinMerge lists 38 differences. Some of them are:  
  From name change to  html5  to  html5   
 something related to data-attributes < Code> vs. customattrprefix = "data -"   
  Audio  and  videos  for features from  & lt; Xsd: attributeGroup name = "mediaAttributeGroup"   
 In some  xsd: element  custom  vs.: is not allowed  attribute  < Li> Other Miscellaneous Elements and Attribution Changes / Extra  
 Now SVG External File  and lt; Xsd: element name = "svg" type = "SVG.svg" vs: isxml = "true" />     

 


  







03:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps

~~Comments Post a Comment~~

Popular Posts google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use a disconnected port object - While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason? Full stack trace: Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038 This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener? I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef... visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? - I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device. Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen. You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do! Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? - I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this? Something like this will appear in the proxy code. #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things? Any ideas? you can git rev-parse -verify HEAD (after :) This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. " git diff " There is very little possibility to change I find it more pronounced rev-parse -verify means "is this a valid object name?" This is your show-ref . You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?" I ask, "what current head exists?" In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...

~~Powered by Blogger~~