In Sql Server is the object_id of an object subject to change? -

In Sql Server is the object_id of an object subject to change? -

I should know if SQL Server 2008 is in a database (also want to know what the difference is for 2005 And 2000) for any reason, a changed object_id for the table will change

by replacing the pre-table, which excludes the ID and creates and in which situation the optician chooses to change the table, if any table Opposes in any other way.

I find anything on the web which is very solid, like a white paper or MSDN article. I just got this conversation:

First of all, the conversation is basically "no" and then it seems that 180. I am looking for a valid quote for any answer. I am not interested in experimenting in front of a real SQL Server design tidbit if there is a strange behavior in which behavior changes, for example, it drops to a table change and rebuilds, but only if it is empty; But if there is data then this ID will not be able to change ... etc I can see how one can come with answering what seems to be true, but is completing the incomplete and complete story.

Longer curved of this question, possibly inadequate descriptive and advancing to pickup nature.

object_id allocated to the time of creation

Behind the Scenes, some of them actually include tables for rebuilding and rebuilding (in some cases, possibly even without) . For example, if you add a column in the middle of a column, then you need to leave it and restart - so a new object_id.

In any case, you should never issue the object_id anytime from the database, just query it every time using object_id ([objectname])








02:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger