javascript - Image Replacement (JS/JQuery) working in IE but not FF -

javascript - Image Replacement (JS/JQuery) working in IE but not FF -

I have tried several solutions to replace broken images (both js and jack) and complete with all IE Work like this but not in FF, is there any reason for this?

Can the images be handled differently in FF which can be the reason for this?

JQuery example:

  $ ("img") .RAR (function ($ (this). Unbund ("error"). Etr ("src" , "Nopic.jpg");});    Javascript example: (started by Honor Event in IIG tag)  
  Function number (IMG } {Img.onerror = ""; img.src = "nopic.jpg"; return true;}    Both of these examples work perfectly in IE but not at FF Thanks!  
 Thanks in advance!   
 
  Do you test locally Stay Are you pointing to the file URL?  
 Try to test on a real server, even if it's just local I believe that Firefox relies on the HTTP status code The error is obtained from the image to trigger; If you are loading with a file: // ... no URL is included in the URL, so you do not get the error.  
 From:  
  When this page So is displayed on the local level can not be removed properly event as error depends on the normal HTTP status code, so generally it will not be triggered if the URL file: protocol.   EDIT:  As we have discussed in the comments, it appears that because of some reason your intranet server 404 (or by any other error, With the sound of things) is not responding to the unavailable resource.  
 Because firefox does not receive an error, it does not trigger error handler, which looks like sensible behavior.  
 I think your problem is not just "My server does not return 404 errors to the missing content", but before you ask, use a bit more to gather evidence (and possibly instead of SO Ask on serverfone) ...   

 


  







03:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger