java - Problem auto wiring when facing object creation through methods -

java - Problem auto wiring when facing object creation through methods -

I am using the classes of sections of my application. As you can see below, everything is perfect but at the same place:

  Fourthreader Reader = New CharArrayReader (Accoda.Cacharray ()); Charstream charStream = New Charstream (Reader); Scanner scanner = new scanner (fourstream); Token stream token stream = new tokenstream (scanner); ParserGeneratingAST parserGeneratingAST = New Pars Generating AST (Token Stream); - & gt; Abstract Syntactistry ast = Parser GeneratingAST.generateAST (); & Lt; - Here's the problem SymbolsTable symbolsTable = new SymbolTable (); ErrorsTable ErrorsTable = New ErrorsTable (); IconTableFillerVisitorsTransTableFillerVisitor = New SymbolTableFillerVisitor (symbols, errorTable); TypeCheckingVisitor typeCheckingVisitor = New TypeCheckingVisitor (symbolic, errorsTable); Index list index list = new direct list (); CodeGenerationVisitor Code GenerationVisitor = New CodeGenerationVisitor (Instruction list); SymbolsTableFillerVisitor.visit (AST); TypeCheckingVisitor.visit (AST); CodeGenerationVisitor.visit (AST);    The line of the problem is  
  summary syntax star = parserGeneratingAST.generateAST ();    Is there a way to use this problem with Pico Container? If possible, I want to keep my classes without annotations.  
 Thank you   
 
  If I understand correctly, Class> abstractSyntaxTree  is being injected into its class, but you use  ParserGeneratingAST  by  AbstractSyntaxTree . Although I am not an expert in Pico Container, I think that in this case you can use the factory which creates the  AbstractSyntaxTree  object (using  ParserGeneratingAST ), and Then you can use   

 


  







02:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger