git cvs - git-cvsserver pserver username propagation -

git cvs - git-cvsserver pserver username propagation -

For some of my company's specific workflow issues, I have some users allowed to work with CVS, while the main repository Is under GIT.

I have chosen git-cvsserver as the implementation for this task.

I have installed the git repository, it is enabled for gitcvs and has set pserver simulation on xinetd.

My problem is that I am created through CVS which is shown under the user who runs xinetd, not the user, I certify against passwd.

That is, I am committed to CVS as user 'Foo', I successfully certify through pserver, but when I do git history for this repo, I think that the user Has been committed by 'Route'.

I looked through the source of Git-cvsserver () and it appears that the CVS login is used only for authentication, not for actual collection. Records in the SQLite database also include 'root' username, not 'af'

Do you have any idea how can I broadcast CVS login for GIT username?

In the GET mailing list, xref:

I have no specific experience with it , But git-cvsserver almost allows git-commit to do actual work GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL and GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL < You can get git-commit to use whatever you want for the author and the commentator by setting environment variables like / code> (also the ) ... ... NAME and ..._ DATE and ..._IDENT ). If you have authentication information, then you can set it to just $ ENV before actual commit. If git-cvsserver does not clean up your environment, you can actually set them with authentication information before the inserts (just in case any commit).








03:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger