Flickr/flickrj: how to get user information after user clicks on web-app? -

Flickr/flickrj: how to get user information after user clicks on web-app? -

I am writing a Java web-app for which I created the Flickr App.

If a Flickr-user registers in my app, they are automatically sent to the URL entered in the Authentication Flow of the Flicker app. Also, give me a parameter frob I can get that user's Flickr user ID of that particular user:

  flickrId = flickrj.getAuthInterface (). GetToken (frob) .getUser (). GetId ();    So it works fine.  
 However, if he uses "the application you are using" and clicks on my app then I do not get any information about the user as far as I can tell Also, if I use the flickrage like  
  frob = flickrj.getAuthInterface (). GetFrob (); I get a frob such as  7x1x7x2x2x8x1x1x0-48x9f1xfdbx8ex9d-x00x5x9  (note that I have some X-ed), which should be frost if I then Use that frob on    flickrId = flickrj.getAuthInterface (). GetToken (frob) .getUser (). GetId ();    I went to an invalid fob on a  
  com.aetrion.flickr.FlickrException: 108: com.aetrion.flickr.auth.AuthInterface.getToken (AuthInterface.java:182):    What should I do to get information about Flickr currently logged in user? I think that the URL or the Flickr was hoping to find something like a placeholder in use, automatically sends some parameters, but I did not get the information about this.   
 
   This in the Fluor Authentication Flow The only problem that calls the URL entered is that when the user comes from Flickr's authorization form, it is different from this type of request.  
 But this is a A more story is ...   

 


  






03:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger