java - JUnit Test of Code that uses GAE/J URLFetchServiceFactory.getURLFetchService() -

java - JUnit Test of Code that uses GAE/J URLFetchServiceFactory.getURLFetchService() -

I have some code I'm deploying on Google App Engine - Java (GAE / J) which it uses Does URLFetchService . I want to use JUnit to test this code. This appears to be a must i have a test that uses their LocalURLFetchServiceTestConfig class is roughly as follows:

  Public class MyRemoteServiceTests {Personal Static Last LocalURLFetchServiceTestConfig urlConfig = New LocalURLFetchServiceTestConfig (); Private Static Final LocalServiceTestHelper Assistant = New LocalServiceTestHelper (urlConfig); @ First public set up () throws an exception {service = new sample service (); Helper.setUp (); } The public zero tiredown () throws up after {exception} {service = null; Helper.tairDown (); } @Test Public Zero testThatCallsCodeThatUsesUrlFetch () {Object Data = service.getRemoteDataUsingUrlFetch ("foo", "bar"); Assert.assertNotNull (data); }}    I still believe that this trial has failed despite using the recommended "assistant" in the GAE / J documentation of the test: " API package 'urlfetch' or 'Laon ()' is said to have not been found.  ".  
 I was thinking that using "Assistant" would be somehow setup GAE environment such that when I call  URLFetchServiceFactory.getURLFetchService ()  my  An example of the getRemoteDataUsingUrlFetch  method, Returned  LocalURLFetchService  from within may be just "work" but that does not seem to be the case.  
  How can I test this code?  
 Am I missing something?  
 I get my  getRemoteDataUsingUrlFetch  to refactor so that it does not use  URLFetchServiceFactory.getURLFetchService ()  because it makes locally inauspicious ??? (It seems that it will actually suck ...)    Any help / suggestions much appreciated!   
 
  Actually, it has been found that my problem fails to include two extra jars on the documentation page Was there. RTM FTW!  
  appengine- local runtime.jar  
 appengine-api-stubs.jar    

 


  






03:22

















Get link





Facebook





X





Pinterest





Email





Other Apps




Comments





Post a Comment







Popular Posts




google chrome extension - Reason for Uncaught Error: Attempting to use
a disconnected port object -



    While retrieving the request from the content script, I get this error in the background page. Does anyone know that this error What can be the reason?   Full stack trace:    Unwanted error: Attempt to use Chrome / Renderer Extension Binding Disconnected Port Objects: 147 Chrome.port Post Message Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 147 ChromeHird.port DicePatchOnConnect.Connect Event Chrome / Renderer Extension Binings: 89IExtension.fu SendResponse.state background.js: 1573db.readTransaction.tx.executeSql.paramStr background.js: 1038    This only happens when Reloading extension is not being helpful for a few hours - it is not that after restarting the Chrome browser it will be a solution that becomes normal for a few hours, content script may continue to send requests for background No response can be sent from the background. Is there any way that I can catch this unwanted error and reset the listener?   I am using chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener for my communication. Bef...






visual studio 2010 - How to reinstall MVC 2 tools for VS2010? -



    I uninstalled ASP.Net MVC 2 device for Visual Studio 2010. How can I restore it? MVC2 downloads seem to include only the VS2008 device.   Whatever I said, says that MVC 2 has been included in VS2010, but the installation of an improvement did not fix it, and MVC 2 is not listed. Add VS2010 / Select a component in the Remove screen.      You will get your VS2010ToolsMVC2.msi VS2010 DVD under WCU \ ASPNETMVC - hopefully it will do!    






Git Bash script to check whether repo has any commits? -



    I have a script on which I need to work differently if there is one, which is one or more , Commits. What is the best way to do this?   Something like this will appear in the proxy code.    #! / Bin / bash if [[`git log_count`] ==" 0 "]]; Then there is no commodity for this repo. # What goods ... and echo are "one or more committed!" # What are the other things?    Any ideas?      you can    git rev-parse -verify HEAD    (after :)     This is a pipeline command, and its behavior vs. "  git diff " There is very little possibility to change   I find it more pronounced  rev-parse -verify  means "is this a valid object name?"    This is your  show-ref .  You ask "Is there anything in this safe / head in the safe?"  I ask, "what current  head  exists?"   In practice, both of these are fair tests, because once you have a branch, so to achieve the  HEAD , some mock values will indicate manually lack of editing It is very diffic...








Powered by Blogger